News:

Rule #1 - Be Patient - Rule #2 - Don't ask when, if you don't contribute - Rule #3 - You have coding skills - LinuxMCE's small brother is available: http://www.agocontrol.com

Main Menu

New VoIP SIP Provider added

Started by felpouse, October 17, 2009, 08:15:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

rages

Hi,

very good, how I can install this upgrade for testing my Eutelia script?


Emanuele

felpouse

Hi Emanuele,

for the moment you can check this track on the svn and correct by hand the related script :

http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/changeset/22412

Or wait for the release of the new package updated.

Regards

Luke

dlewis

We've committed this patch and it should be in the next beta (beta3).

felpouse


wierdbeard65

Quote from: dlewis on October 28, 2009, 02:50:06 PM
We've committed this patch and it should be in the next beta (beta3).
Does that mean Beta2 is now out?
Paul
If you have the time to help, please see where I have got to at: [url="http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/User:Wierdbeard65"]http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/User:Wierdbeard65[/url]

dlewis

Not yet. We will announce beta2 soon.

ladekribs

Hi all,

I modified the broadvoice script to work with my SIP provider bredband2telefoni (who sadly not seems to want to expand anymore).

I got outgoing to work, but incoming gets stuck with "the number you have dialed is not in service", and when i check inbound route,
I have the phone number in "DID Number" and set destination is set to "Custom APP:custom-linuxmce,102,1 witch looks right to me.

what did i miss to do?

Best Regards Stefan.

D.plaut

Just one tiny thing I would like to see added to the developers edition which would, for me, make life complete.  That is the ability to set groups transparency through the api.

Is it possible that this can be added?

felpouse

Hi all,

I would like to tell that the last release of 0810 beta2 with the Messagenet SIP provider integrated had a little bug in the perl script "create_amp_Messagenet.pl" , with the CR at the end of all the lines.

Please see the above ticket that I'd reopen to signal this, and uploaded the new one corrected I hope.

http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/ticket/373

Sorry for the inconvenient  ;)

Best regards

Luke

felpouse

Hi all,

thanks to jdecker, the commitment is already active with the correction. See there :

http://svn.linuxmce.org/trac.cgi/changeset/22568

Regards

Like