Reacting will result in that you commit to these rules and that you will do effort for this project, unless you already proved your commitment to LinuxMCEThis is an attempt to create a structured workgroup to establish the following:
What- What the workgroup will be about
- re-doing the manual?
- re-organise the wiki?
- maintaining the wiki!/manual
WhoPeople who cannot code, but want to help
People with common sense
People with endurance (deadlines will be made and kept)
People with team spirit
WhyIt is needed, but it is not possible to let this be done by one person, or persons who do not commit themselves to the task.
Experience tells me, a lot is said, and done for 2 - 3 months and the initiator flies away. I want to prevent this. That is why we need a team.
What notPeople who think they can influence the direction of the Dev's
People who think they gain power and influence doing this
People who do not listen
People who think that managers are the greatest asset to a company (they are not, I know, I am a manager)
People who think that tedious jobs will be done by others
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ok I am going to something evil and wrong here, just like Napoleon.
But I am going to crown myself manager of this project
Not because I need the extra work, or I want to hostage LinuxMCE, but I think it is needed for this type of project.
Later we can decide otherwise.
Reacting will result in that you commit to these rules and that you will do effort for this project, unless you already proved your commitment to LinuxMCEIf you mingle in the discussion you will are a participant of the project, let's put the money where the mouth is.
Blurting out ideas is not what I am seeking. Open to suggestions of course.
Reacting will result in that you commit to these rules and that you will do effort for this project, unless you already proved your commitment to LinuxMCE