Testing Myth 0.23 Snapshot LinuxMCE-8.10-22966-i386.iso | not working

[bongowongo]

If you are trying to help testing 0.23,  the latest snapshot-build is not working at all. I am talking about  LinuxMCE-8.10-22966-i386.iso 22-May-2010 00:16  3.8G . The latest build which results in at least a working core, but half-broken myth 0.23 = LinuxMCE-8.10-22958-i386.iso 20-May-2010 16:16  3.8G.
Hopefully I speared you some downloading and installing woes.

[Kezza]

Thanks,

I have 22958 runnning at the moment with Myth issues although kinda works does compain about backend not reachable I think but then starts TV anyway! everything else seems fine so far.

This could be a good thing to have as a sticky on the forum for people to post about experiences of snapshots? Would save people time and bandwith (especially those hosting the site!)

[bongowongo]

Well people should not just try to install a snapshot if they are not willing to endure faults and or mishaps.
I just did this because I am the first to download and install it <I think>. But if more people want to test, now you know the risks with the lastest two.

[MANDINGO]

The truth is the snapshot are for devs and testers to check for errors as we change and debug the system

So if you install a snapshot it is at your own risk  

but please hold out and we will announce when .23 is ready

Its sooner than you think

Thanks

Mandingo

[Kezza]

I have no problem about any of that and I do use the snapshots to test new features expecting hit and miss for working images (thats what I have backups for!)... BUT if so why is it in the wiki for installing 8.10 "Highly recommended"? (could be wrong but didn't you put that up bongowongo? )

Anyway was not wanting to turn this into anything was just a suggestion. 

glad .23 is coming along nicely. Great work and thanks to those involved in getting it sorted!

[bongowongo]

I have no problem about any of that and I do use the snapshots to test new features expecting hit and miss for working images (thats what I have backups for!)... BUT if so why is it in the wiki for installing 8.10 "Highly recommended"? (could be wrong but didn't you put that up bongowongo? )

Anyway was not wanting to turn this into anything was just a suggestion. 

glad .23 is coming along nicely. Great work and thanks to those involved in getting it sorted!

You are right, not very smart of me, maybe I should change it.