Wow, I've got 2 words for you......RESTRAINING ORDER!!! LMAO! Even if he is right, which is debatable, the fact that he sat down and stalked you on the forum, comes off like a scene from a movie on the lifetime movie channel. He clearly has too much time on his hands and will be hiding in the bushes under your kitchen window with a knife because you didn't give him the latest code lol. Ok, I've had a good laugh, back to my life, I actually have one. Lol
Andy, since this is a legal binding contract (licensing agreement), if I pay you monies, can you please update us on the 'broad' terms of your licensing agreement so I am legally informed prior to purchase?
Planning phase of the license but pay us now... Right. I've heard that before. Can you elaborate on which (exactly) portions of your release will be GPL and what capabilities the 'base' Dianemo-Rpi2 includes? This is very ambiguous and leaves room for you to decide, after you have solicited monies from people, which portions you may release as GPL and which not. Since the majority of the base of the Dianemo system is GPL (as LinuxMCE is) I'm not sure what the difference is and when/if you intend to provide source for those GPL portions.
Do 'developers' get access to source code that non-'developers' would not have access to?
I'm sorry. Did I just read that correctly. People will have to pay for support through this 'free' forum? WTF? I do not agree with this myself. Andrew do you intend to sponsor the forums and pay for the running of the forum to help with your 'paid' support that you will provide?
For you, yes it appears to be. I really love what you're doing (from a commercial standpoint). But to do it on the back of OSS and a free support forum appears shady to me.
Andy please expressly describe the exactly legal specifications of the license I would pay for. Thank you.
All the best
Jason