News:

Rule #1 - Be Patient - Rule #2 - Don't ask when, if you don't contribute - Rule #3 - You have coding skills - LinuxMCE's small brother is available: http://www.agocontrol.com

Main Menu

Looking at gear for MCE - Good/Bad?? (EDITED)

Started by PcCowboy, May 19, 2009, 05:33:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

colinjones

I think you should avoid any mention of Class 3 devices. They are not common for the simple reason that their range makes them practically useless except for true PANs, which is not an LMCE use-case. While it is true that many devices can achieve 3m, many will only achieve the specified 1m, especially with local environment considerations, and this renders it useless for us. We don't want to be giving advise that clearly is not going to work for some people. I think the Class 2 devices are the only real option.

PcCowboy


Ok that's what I was thinking. So thanks for that clarification.

brake16

Quote from: colinjones on May 21, 2009, 12:54:30 AM
I think you should avoid any mention of Class 3 devices. They are not common for the simple reason that their range makes them practically useless except for true PANs, which is not an LinuxMCE use-case. While it is true that many devices can achieve 3m, many will only achieve the specified 1m, especially with local environment considerations, and this renders it useless for us. We don't want to be giving advise that clearly is not going to work for some people. I think the Class 2 devices are the only real option.

Colin

All that sounds good, except for the part about avoiding mentioning them.  Since they do exist, it wouldn't hurt to say in the Bluetooth wiki what you just said above, so that somebody isn't left wondering.  Do you mind if I quote/paraphrase you?

Bryce
The Second Empirical Law of Lasers is to not look into the beam with your remaining good eye  - Anonymous

colinjones