Author Topic: Insteon vs. X10  (Read 8108 times)

hari

  • Administrator
  • LinuxMCE God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2428
    • View Profile
    • ago control
Re: Insteon vs. X10
« Reply #15 on: November 13, 2008, 12:45:21 pm »
I can understand your aversion against wireless :-)

The 868mhz ISM band is pretty reliable because of the 1% duty cycle limitation in Europe. What I can tell from my tests Z-Wave is much more reliable than powerline based communications like PLCBUS. If you want wires, go KNX/EIB.

best regards,
Hari
rock your home - http://www.agocontrol.com home automation

johanr

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
    • View Profile
Re: Insteon vs. X10
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2008, 01:09:57 pm »
Now I really hijacked the tread, sorry for the OT theminor.
KNX/EIB products needs a separate cable to each switch or device to be controlled and since Sadly I noticed this Kick ass project after the building plans where already made and walls had been "shut".

 This means pulling new cables all over which can=will be a pain. My plan is more or less Full controll via LMCE :)

-johan

bulek

  • Administrator
  • wants to work for LinuxMCE
  • *****
  • Posts: 909
  • Living with LMCE
    • View Profile
Re: Insteon vs. X10
« Reply #17 on: November 15, 2008, 05:34:24 pm »
Now I really hijacked the tread, sorry for the OT theminor.
KNX/EIB products needs a separate cable to each switch or device to be controlled and since Sadly I noticed this Kick ass project after the building plans where already made and walls had been "shut".

 This means pulling new cables all over which can=will be a pain. My plan is more or less Full controll via LMCE :)

-johan

AFAIK, EIB/Knx has also possibility to run over existing cables. It will cost you more money, but I think modules are there (I think there is one manufacturer that is specialized in those modules over 220V wires)...

There seems that also Knx-RF is emerging.

HTH,

regards,

bulek.

Thanks in advance,

regards,

Bulek.