Rule #1 - Be Patient - Rule #2 - Don't ask when, if you don't contribute - Rule #3 - You have coding skills - LinuxMCE's small brother is available: http://www.agocontrol.com
AndrewI agree for your purposes this could turn out to be useless, but remember that not everyone has the luxury of multi-zone or matrix systems ... and for them I think that even going from 1000-2000ms down to 20-200ms sync would be a significant improvement they would like. Plus, as I said there are other side benfits!I have tried the broadcast/slave mode of xine-ui:core - xine -A none -V none --broadcast-port 6789 /home/public/data/videos/file.aviMD - xine slave://192.168.80.1:6789But unfortunately the client side fails with a Floating Point Exception irrespective of the media file I use... dunno why. Done some searches and can't find anything for that for my hardware so I have logged a ticket with the Xine Project... hopefully they can advise.....
Could LinuxMCE use PulseAudio sinks? PulseAudio was incorporated into Ubuntu and implements a 'glitch-free' synchronous multi-output network sound server system. It is the best sync for a networked sound system that I have heard. It's still not perfect. Just a thought.[edit: spelling]
Just a small note.During our LinuxTag 2008 adventure, some guy came to me, and asked how we achieved synchronization. And I told him, we don't.After a bit chatting, he said, they have been trying to achieve synchronized audio for a couple of years, and still have not had success.
Quote from: phenigma on April 09, 2009, 10:59:28 pmCould LinuxMCE use PulseAudio sinks? PulseAudio was incorporated into Ubuntu and implements a 'glitch-free' synchronous multi-output network sound server system. It is the best sync for a networked sound system that I have heard. It's still not perfect. Just a thought.[edit: spelling]Hmmm... that sounds promising and definitely worth some research as Thom says.Andrew
Need some advice[...]