Hello,
I am trying to integrate a CM11A to control my light module with LinuxMCE.
I added the CM11A in interface and the parnet is the CORE.
It don't work. This is the message in the log of CM11 :
10 02/05/08 23:48:20.213 Receive string: MESSAGE 82 <0xb70f0b90>
10 02/05/08 23:48:20.213 Received MESSAGE 82 0x806ca10 device: 19 <0xb70f0b90>
10 02/05/08 23:48:20.213 Received Message type 1 ID 760 from 0 to 19 (device: 19) resp 0 <0xb70f0b90>
10 02/05/08 23:48:20.214 Could not find a handler for message - from 0 to 19 Type: 1 ID: 760 (device: 19) Command_Impl1 Dev #19 <0xb70f0b90>
Have you looked at: http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11 (http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11)?
I'm not having any problems with my CM11 under 0710 BETA3, and as far as I can see you can't do much wrong other then not configuring the right serial port ("COM Port on PC").
I have also problems with lmce keeping the cm11a controller on the right port.
When i wait ten minutes after setting the com port + reload router then i don't get any messages but the com port is unselected so i have to select it again (device disabled).
With kind regards,
William van de Velde
Quote from: Zaerc on February 06, 2008, 01:47:00 AM
Have you looked at: http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11 (http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11)?
I'm not having any problems with my CM11 under 0710 BETA3, and as far as I can see you can't do much wrong other then not configuring the right serial port ("COM Port on PC").
What about problem with bad checksum:
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending address with HouseCode=6, DeviceCode=6. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending packet with HighByte=4, LowByte=66. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending header with Checksum: 6a. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:42.677 Got response: 5a from CM11A. <0x41802950>
01 02/10/08 21:18:42.677 Bad checksum received (send:6a, recieved:5a)Have you found the way to solve that?
Quote from: Michael on February 10, 2008, 08:26:18 PM
Quote from: Zaerc on February 06, 2008, 01:47:00 AM
Have you looked at: http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11 (http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/CM11)?
I'm not having any problems with my CM11 under 0710 BETA3, and as far as I can see you can't do much wrong other then not configuring the right serial port ("COM Port on PC").
What about problem with bad checksum:
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending address with HouseCode=6, DeviceCode=6. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending packet with HighByte=4, LowByte=66. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:38.769 Sending header with Checksum: 6a. <0x41802950>
10 02/10/08 21:18:42.677 Got response: 5a from CM11A. <0x41802950>
01 02/10/08 21:18:42.677 Bad checksum received (send:6a, recieved:5a)
Have you found the way to solve that?
Well, it's more of a workaround... I don't use sensors or X10 remotes. ;) But I guess that doesn't really help you. :-\
Quote from: Zaerc on February 11, 2008, 12:54:11 AM
Well, it's more of a workaround... I don't use sensors or X10 remotes. ;) But I guess that doesn't really help you. :-\
Trying to figure out why this bug still exists. Sure X10 is old and definitely not perfect. But people still use it and IMHO it'd be nice to have 100% working X10 interface. Unfortunately, I'm not C++ guru. So, I'm afraid it might take a lot of time to patch the code by my self.