LinuxMCE Forums
May 18, 2013, 02:53:09 pm GMT-1 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Rule #1 - Be Patient - Rule #2 - Don't ask when, if you don't contribute - Rule #3 - You have coding skills - LinuxMCE's small brother is available: http://www.agocontrol.com
 
   Home   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: NFS VS. SMB  (Read 592 times)
itspac
Veteran
***
Posts: 136


View Profile
« on: May 31, 2008, 05:27:33 pm »

Is there any advatage to using either NFS or SMB shares?  Performance, compatability with LMCE should be considered.   

There isn't much in the wiki or here that I have seen from previous searches.
Logged
royw
Guru
****
Posts: 261


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2008, 07:30:50 am »

I'll start the response with some opinions.  I'm sure others will have different opinions.

The biggest factor is what your server is.  If it's a windows box, then you will probably use SMB/CIFS.  If your server is *nix, then you have the choice between NFS and samba.  IMO, setting up NFS is easier than samba.  If your server is an appliance (NAS) you may or may not have a choice.

NFS is reportedly usually a little faster than samba.  Not enough to really matter until you start to saturate your gigabit network.

Your file servers should be on your internal network, so security shouldn't be a main issue, but if it is, then there are different security issues between NFS and SMB/CIFS.

FYI, I run a MS-free house, so chose NFS servers.

Have fun,
Roy
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!