|
magner
|
 |
« on: November 08, 2010, 07:24:40 pm » |
|
Hi, After following the advise above, the apt-get update worked fine. But when I apt-get dist-uprade, i get... Err http://old-releases.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main linux-restricted-modules-2.6.27-17-generic 2.6.27-17.23 404 Not Found (as an example) I then followed the http to path ( http://old-releases.ubuntu.com ) and noticed all the specified paths do not exist any longer. i.e no link to intrepid-security... can somebody please direct me to the correct location to download the needed files for apt-get dist-upgrade thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rperre
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2010, 02:05:52 am » |
|
Just for reference, i just checked my install with the change in sources.list i made everything old-releases and apt-get update goes fine here is my sources.list deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid main restricted universe multiverse
deb-src http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid main restricted universe multiverse
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid-updates main restricted universe multiverse
deb-src http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid-updates main restricted universe multiverse
deb http://deb.linuxmce.org/ubuntu/ intrepid beta2
deb http://debian.slimdevices.com/ stable main
deb http://packages.medibuntu.org/ intrepid free non-free
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid-security main restricted universe multiverse
deb-src http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid-security main restricted universe multiverse
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ intrepid main universe multiverse
deb http://deb.linuxmce.org/ubuntu/ replacements_debian main
deb http://deb.linuxmce.org/ubuntu/ 20dev_ubuntu main Richard |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
magner
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2010, 07:26:59 pm » |
|
Hi Richard, thanks for your help.
Yea upt-get update worked fine for me too with the old-releases change.
My problem was with apt-get dist-uprade not finding the correct http site.
It seems your (/etc/apt/sources.list) differs from mine , so for experimental purposes I used your /etc/apt/sources.list and ran apt-get dist-uprade . There was more action with downloading files, but then the same 404 problem happened again.
Cheers
Dan
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rperre
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2010, 08:08:36 pm » |
|
On my virtualbox install i got 404's while trying to install java stuff, is this where yours is halting?
Richard
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kilo
Newbie
Posts: 6
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2010, 04:32:59 am » |
|
Do we know if this will run on a newer version of Kubuntu. It seems that most of the packages are not supported anymore because most of the important Intrepid folders dont exist anymore. It seems we would do better with a newer version and stop messing with Intrepid. Just asking... Later  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tschak909
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2010, 08:13:24 pm » |
|
(1) we are working on getting LinuxMCE to build atop Lucid. (We still have a lot to do even after all the packages build. Major system changes have taken place)
(2) We are changing the master database to point to archived versions of needed 8.10 system packages.
This is the official message coming from us, the developers working on this project.
-Thom
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mythtified
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2010, 09:20:53 pm » |
|
Thx Thom. Some of us have found a work around and have posted it in the forum. This should help others install and use the system until a more permanent solution is found.
Thx for the hard work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
willow3
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2010, 11:04:18 am » |
|
(1) we are working on getting LinuxMCE to build atop Lucid. (We still have a lot to do even after all the packages build. Major system changes have taken place)
(2) We are changing the master database to point to archived versions of needed 8.10 system packages.
This is the official message coming from us, the developers working on this project.
-Thom
Thanks a lot for your hard (unpaid, sparetime) work! With a little patience from our side I am sure this will work out just fine. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Zaerc
Alumni
LinuxMCE God
Posts: 2256
Department of Redundancy Department.
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2010, 04:34:54 pm » |
|
(1) we are working on getting LinuxMCE to build atop Lucid. (We still have a lot to do even after all the packages build. Major system changes have taken place)
...
So who's working on that then? I've already got them to build months ago... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Change is inevitable. Progress is optional." -- Anonymous  |
|
|
|
tschak909
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2010, 05:16:12 pm » |
|
Zaerc, we've gotten the packages to build, and are now working through bugs.
For example, we are needing to now replace HAL with a DCE Device that uses DeviceKit.
-Thom
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bongowongo
wants to work for LinuxMCE
Posts: 826
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2010, 05:57:01 pm » |
|
(1) we are working on getting LinuxMCE to build atop Lucid. (We still have a lot to do even after all the packages build. Major system changes have taken place)
...
So who's working on that then? I've already got them to build months ago... Ok great news, could you please share your endaveours |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mythtified
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2010, 06:47:41 pm » |
|
Now I am just asking out of curiosity, is there a time frame for a release for us to start testing? No pressure, just something to look forward to.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
phenigma
wants to work for LinuxMCE
Posts: 779
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2010, 10:43:07 pm » |
|
(1) we are working on getting LinuxMCE to build atop Lucid. (We still have a lot to do even after all the packages build. Major system changes have taken place)
...
So who's working on that then? I've already got them to build months ago... I too was wondering this as I managed to get most of the project to build under 1004. Not suggesting that I have the knowledge to fix many of the issues that have arisen but... Where is the svn branch for 1004 and where are updated sqlCVS tables with lucid data? The 'Lets move to 1004' chant has been sung by many and, I'm sure, many people here could/would put time into this if they knew what was/is going on. A unknown post in an un-related topic is an absolutely terrible way of 'Officially' announcing anything. J. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tschak909
|
|
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2010, 03:24:25 pm » |
|
I checked in part of the needed bits to the Package tables in sqlCVS this last weekend. I will do the rest soon. I am doing them by hand, so that I can see the package landscape as it is at the moment.
Once this is done, I will talk to possy about cloning the 0810 branch to be trunk. There were unusual circumstances which forced us to abandon trunk, and start from the 0710 branch (Aaron, prior to folding Pluto, was experimenting with what would eventually become Vera in trunk, and made changes in sqlCVS that broke things for us.)
-Thom
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
