Messages

316

Installation issues / Re: Some calls are being made

« on: February 17, 2012, 12:48:10 pm »

Nope, the phones are in a closed room, and during night, i'm for sure that nobody will work on it...

I've put a 'pattern' for outgoing calls that don't match this (i don't allow international calls for the moment, so no 00). Th strange part in here is that i don't understand why it was answered for 4 seconds...

The IP is completely unknown by me...

317

Users / Re: Shares (backdoor access?)

« on: February 17, 2012, 12:45:36 pm »

Won't it be more logical if user folders are for users, and public folders for everyone? 

318

Users / [Solved] Shares (backdoor access?)

« on: February 17, 2012, 10:51:46 am »

Hey,

I've got some users configured in linuxmce.
When somebody access now the server from a windows 7 client, he sees following in the network neighbour:

• User1
• User2
• Public
• Home

When he's user1, he has access to User1 and Public, but not to User2. Nice, like it should be.
But he can open Home, and open in there User2. So not nice...

Any idea what i'm doing wrong?


Thanks!

319

Installation issues / Some calls are being made

« on: February 17, 2012, 10:41:59 am »

Hey,

I'm playing around with some phone & linuxMCE. At first sight, very simple (once you figure out how to put your cisco phone on SIP), and it works perfectly.
Internally, i can do some calls, to the external world it works... I've request and external number now, so waiting delivery to test incoming calls...

But when i look in my logs, from time to time, some strange entries. I'm wondering who is answering this.

• The phone calls don't make it to the outside world (000xxxx). My provider logs stay empty....
• And the calls from 101 to 101? I don't have an extension 101...

Do i need to worry about something or is this normal behaviour?

ID Calldate  Channel Source Clid Dst Disposition Duration
7.     2012-02-16 08:07:36    SIP/202-b5...    202    "device" <202>    0001520173882639    ANSWERED    00:04
8.     2012-02-16 08:07:24    SIP/202-b5...    202    "device" <202>    00020173882639    ANSWERED    00:04
9.     2012-02-16 00:56:07    SIP/178.11...    101    101    s    ANSWERED    00:13
10.     2012-02-16 00:56:05    SIP/178.11...    101    101    s    ANSWERED    00:12

320

Users / Fresh installation with asterisk issues...

« on: February 11, 2012, 01:31:15 pm »

Hey,

I've just reinstall the whole linuxmce server because i thought i messed up the asterisk module.
After the installation of 8.10 and a restore of the database pluto_main (that's all i did), i'm not able to launch asterisk 'properly'.

I'm getting the errors:

• Error Could not reload FOP server
  Could not reload the FOP operator panel server using the bounce_op.sh script. Configuration changes may not be reflected in the panel display.
  Added 2 minutes ago
  (freepbx.reload_fop)
• symlink from modules failed
  retrieve_conf failed to sym link the /etc/asterisk/sip.conf file from modules
  Added 2 minutes ago
  (retrieve_conf.SYMLINK)
• Failed to copy from module agi-bin
  Retrieve conf failed to copy file(s) from a module's agi-bin dir: copy(/usr/share/asterisk/agi-bin/directory): failed to open stream: Permission denied
  copy(/usr/share/asterisk/agi-bin/list-item-remove.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied
• Default SQL Password Used
• No email address for online update checks

When i now add a phone in linuxmce, the asterisk picks up the extension.
But i'm a bit afraid to go on with my installation. Is it safe to go on, or will this mess up my whole setup later on?

Thanks to point me to the right direction...

321

Feature requests & roadmap / Re: Newsletter / mailing

« on: January 31, 2012, 12:49:37 pm »

That's maybe why a blog (with rss) could be interesting?
Fe if somebody has created a new skin, this could be posted on that blog. Or fe a nice howto to add a ip-phone. Or ...

Not really official 'news', but i think that a lot of guys are interested in these kind of things?
And could be interesting to have more 'testers' / feedback?

322

Feature requests & roadmap / Newsletter / mailing

« on: January 31, 2012, 07:44:39 am »

Maybe an idea to bring a kind of newsletter in the scope?
This way, new plug-ins/versions/skins/nice-to-know/... -things can be better announced?

Personally i want to stay up to date about new evolutions.
It's a bit hard to go each time through the wiki's, the site, the forum to see if anything is changed.

Of course, different ways are possible:

• mailing
• blog/rss (think this can be the best way?)
• updates over fb/twitter
• ...

323

Users / Re: New Version of the Dianemo iOS Orbiter

« on: January 31, 2012, 07:13:03 am »

connect to their cores from remote locations using a proxy service provided by Cascade, it might make more sense.

Okay, not remotely on network/technical level, but on geographical location...


ps works great...

324

Users / Re: New Version of the Dianemo iOS Orbiter

« on: January 29, 2012, 01:11:26 pm »

You should also select "Connect locally"

This did the trick.
Not very logical to me, but it works...

thanks!!!

325

Users / Re: greats

« on: January 29, 2012, 09:51:17 am »

authentification error
please verify your user credentials !

connection error
the operation could'nt be completed. (NSURLErrorDomain error -1012)

I'm gettting the same error here.
What i've got done:
Followed the installation of the weborbiter. For the moment, the listen port is here 3463. Not sure if this is important.
The device number is #113, the child is #115.

In the Dieanemo app (version 1.5  ), i've inserted following settings:

• Description: ServerName
• Installation number: 113 (couldn't figure this one out, i've also tried the listen port (3463))
• Device number: 113
• User name: UserName in LinuxMCE
• Password: Password for user above
• Nerve Centre IP: 192.168.0.1 (IP of linuxmce)

326

Users / Weborbiter Automatic login

« on: January 26, 2012, 05:44:12 pm »

Does anybody knows a way to login automaticlly to a weborbiter from a certain pc?

I know you can do it on server level, but of course, you open everything at this moment.
i've got 2 pc's where i would like to make a shortcut to a weborbiter. So only a double click should open it up and let you control your house...

327

Users / Re: Upgrade from 810 to 1004

« on: January 21, 2012, 02:03:35 pm »

If you do have a spare disk, why not trying it out, and see what happens.

This was my idea. My first installations isn't completely messed up, so i would like to keep it safe for a while...

I've just installed a fresh version of the 1004, and tried a restore of the 810.
But it doesn't seem to do much. I select the zip, choose restore, and after a few seconds, i've got 2 menu's on the left. Nothing more.
I don't see any rooms created or so. So i suppose that backup isn't restore like it should be.
It would be a very fast restore as well, the zip is about 75MB big. So a few seconds for the copy/restore/...

Any suggestions?
I'll start the restore once more, and check back in a while (30minutes?)...
Or...

328

Users / Upgrade from 810 to 1004

« on: January 20, 2012, 08:00:13 am »

Hey,

I think I messed up my asterisk module in linuxmce (see this topic).
And probably the best (fasted) way is to reinstall the whole server...

I was now wondering if I could take a backup of my 840 server, install the 1004 server and restore the backup over there.
Or better not?

329

Users / Re: Improving network proformance

« on: January 20, 2012, 07:54:14 am »

I marked out the IPs with XXs, why your having me test the out side network is beyond me.

Just for your info:
I meant to do a traceroute from you client machine (behind your linuxmce box). This can bring forward who gives you latency (your network gateway, internet gateway...). Maybe not directly useful for you GB copy problem, since I guess it's something local (nice to have the drawing, remember).
These are always basic/first test i'll do to troubleshoot network issues.
Another very useful command in this line is the command MTR. Give it a try: 'sudo mtr www.linuxmce.org'

But i would focus on the dropped packets in your case... 

330

Users / Re: Improving network proformance

« on: January 20, 2012, 07:45:46 am »

eth0   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 20:cf:30:c0:ff:46
          inet addr:192.168.3.80  Bcast:192.168.3.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::22cf:30ff:fec0:ff46/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:643754728 errors:0 dropped:3991875718 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:156841564 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:1054057917 (1.0 GB)  TX bytes:1290091923 (1.2 GB)
          Interrupt:221

I'm a bit worried about your dropped recieved packages. What is Eth0? Seen the amount of packages, i would say the LAN side?
This is mostly due a bad driver or lack of networkmemory... Bad cables mostly give collisions...

Maybe a quick test is to change the networkcard?
Try maybe to swap your LAN / WAN side?