Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - phenigma

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 67
16
Users / Re: NEW Remote Screens for UI1
« on: October 14, 2014, 07:01:18 pm »
Let me know if you have any issues with the screens, everything is mostly good here but I have yet to add the Bind to Remote commands which may cause some undesired input switching until I can get those added.

J.

17
Developers / Re: squeezelite as an alternative to squeezeslave
« on: October 14, 2014, 05:14:52 am »
I still think it be nice if you add a proper description to the devices (maybe even the room).

Um?  No.  You can edit the device and describe it any way you would like, just like every other device in the system.

And an optional pulsesink selection. I did both in the code I posted previously (not the room though)

Heh.  Ok.  I don't see any code or feature patches to support pulseaudio anywhere in the system in trac anywhere.  And since we don't support pulseaudio I will not add specific pulseaudio code until the system supports it.  That being said: Have you even tried it?  Have you put your pulse:sink name in as the output device?  I don't think you've even tried it and from the squeezelite documentation it appears that it should work as is.

Look, I'm getting really frustrated that you that certain people continually complain about things without actually trying to do much of anything about it.  I work *really* hard here *for free* to try and support all kinds of things for people, including things that I don't use like the damn squeezeslave/squeezelite players.   So thanks for testing, I'm glad you're complaining that it doesn't slice and dice and make damn Julien fries at the same freakin' time.  I'm really happy that it's 'working' but not 'properly' becuase it doesn't describe the device to your satisfaction and that it doesn't support an audio subsystem that we don't support at all.

Despite my rant: Please let me know if the existing functionality, as intended, is working or if there are any issues with it because I want it to work properly within the existing system.  If you want it to do something it doesn't do then *please* open a feature request in trac.  Then feel free to provide proper svn patches to provide those features.  If you are unsure how to do that then *please* ask in #linuxmce-devel on freenode irc for specific assistance.

J.

18
Users / Re: NEW Remote Screens for UI1
« on: October 14, 2014, 04:56:44 am »
Heh.  As posde says, no.  The screens are for controlling an XBOX 360 through InfraRed from a MD.

J.

19
Users / Re: Last lmce-squeezeslave update give me an error
« on: October 10, 2014, 12:55:37 am »
I believe there is a priority parameter, perhaps that could make a difference?

20
Users / Re: Last lmce-squeezeslave update give me an error
« on: October 09, 2014, 01:38:56 pm »
That's a definite possibility.  I have much higher cpu usages here, which is confusing me a little.  Check the squeezelite command line settings and you can alter /usr/pluto/bin/Launch_Squeezeslave.sh to add any items for testing.

If we find that buffers are the issue, or other command line items, then we can add those pieces into the webadmin and the script as permanent values.

J.

21
Users / Re: Last lmce-squeezeslave update give me an error
« on: October 08, 2014, 07:15:06 pm »
That shouldn't be an issue, afaict.  What is the load like with all three squeezelites playing?

Squeezelite has the ability to upsample all it's outputs, I wonder if it is doing that?  And, if it is, I wonder how much impact that is having?

J.

22
Users / Re: Last lmce-squeezeslave update give me an error
« on: October 08, 2014, 06:09:37 pm »
The proper package was in the repository.  However the failed package would not complete to allow the new package in.  An apt-get install --reinstall lmce-squeezeslave would have gotten around that.

This is a build of squeezelite from the original source.  Squeezeslave is no longer supported or being developed.  I have been running this for some time now without any issues.  I have no missing time in any of the tracks I play.  We will likely have to push any issues we discover back upstream to the squeezelite author.

A question:  What are you running squeezelite on (cpu speed/# of cores/what else is the machine doing)?  How many squeezelites are you running on this machine?  Squeezelite takes a lot more resources than squeezeslave did and that could have an impact on the number of squeeze devices you can run at one time.

When you say parts of the songs are 'missing' do you mean that the track appears to skip in the middle of playing?  Or does it start a few seconds into the song or finish a few seconds early?

J.

23
Users / Re: Last lmce-squeezeslave update give me an error
« on: October 07, 2014, 06:39:19 pm »
Hey, sorry about this.  I did fix it within a couple of hours of causing it though.  If you apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade it *should* fix everything.  Please let me know what happens if it does not and I'll look at it asap.

J.  :)

24
Developers / Re: squeezelite as an alternative to squeezeslave
« on: October 05, 2014, 07:57:18 pm »
This has been folded into 1204 now for anyone that would like to test and report back on results.  Thanks!

J.

25
Installation issues / Re: CuBox-i from SolidRun
« on: October 02, 2014, 08:03:07 pm »
Change your sleeping pattern: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphasic_sleep

Et Voila! way more time :)

/hmm.  How did I know you were going to hit me with that!   ;D

26
Users / Re: Shellshock vulnerability - do we need to do anything?
« on: October 02, 2014, 06:29:55 pm »
Keep in mind that the majority of LMCE scripts are bash based and are not compatible with dash.  You will want to ensure that bash is updated and functional.

J.

27
Users / Re: Why Do Media Directors Exist?
« on: October 02, 2014, 06:27:32 pm »
In the future that may change. Whats missing in lmce today is all the Core side code to support upnp player devices. That's a fairly big chunk of code. Also our Raspbmc-CEC firmware image has Dianemo specific packages that implement the Dianemo CEC controller device, and those packages would need updating somewhat.

Yup, we are sorely missing the upnp capability.  I think what you've done with xbmc and an add-on cec device is a great option!  Coupled with the set-up packs it's an extremely enticing option!  :)

J.

28
Installation issues / Re: CuBox-i from SolidRun
« on: October 02, 2014, 06:24:16 pm »
:)  Time...  it's really all I need more of.  :)

J.

29
Users / Re: Zoom not working in 12.04?
« on: September 30, 2014, 06:18:41 pm »
First I've heard of it.  Have you tried multple types of media?  What is the video output method you are using (xv, vaapi, vdpau?)

J.

30
Developers / Re: Raspberry Pi Generic Serial Device
« on: September 30, 2014, 06:13:57 pm »
Neato!  Sounds like great fun!

J.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 67