Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Esperanto

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 19
16
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: December 03, 2014, 11:35:53 am »
Guys, I can not stress this enough:

FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS HOLY, MAKE YOUR SIP EXTENSION PASSWORDS, STRONG! THERE IS A RASH OF SIP_VICIOUS RUNS HAPPENING WITH PHONE SPAMMERS LOOKING FOR FREE EXTENSIONS!

IF YOU PUT A PASSWORD like '12345' ON ONE OF YOUR SIP EXTENSIONS, IT'S YOUR OWN FUCKING FAULT, FOR WHAT HAPPENS! FIX IT!

EVEN BETTER? FIREWALL OFF PORT 5060, IF YOUR REGISTRAR CAN HANDLE REGISTRATIONS WITHOUT REQUIRING THE PORT TO BE OPEN!

-Thom

Since the sip was not working I was not using the system and therefore had just a default install without any password modification. The passwords I noticed on the phone devices page are all something like: "ng1jaa7m4ccyaomc". So if that is an issue then I think a default install might be unsave.

17
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 26, 2014, 09:42:31 am »
That's why i suggested disabling his WAN side connection to see if the call traffic went away.

That seems to stop the activity (see gap between 8:40 and 9:26) . How to prevent it without unplugging?  ;)

Code: [Select]
2014-11-26 09:38:03 SIP 1006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-26 09:32:24 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 09:31:18 SIP 100 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-26 09:27:13 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 09:26:15 SIP 1006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 08:40:06 SIP 6000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 08:36:39 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:12
2014-11-26 08:35:39 SIP 6000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 08:30:26 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 08:28:39 SIP 6000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 08:24:30 SIP 10001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 08:21:46 SIP 6000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-26 08:17:25 SIP 1005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-26 08:11:42 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 08:08:45 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 08:07:58 SIP 6001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 08:05:56 SIP 1005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:56:29 SIP 1003 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 07:54:48 SIP 1005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:54:10 SIP 6001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:52:52 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 07:43:34 SIP 1005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:40:43 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 07:40:33 SIP 6001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:33:44 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:12
2014-11-26 07:32:07 SIP 5000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:26:22 SIP 123456 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-26 07:20:56 SIP 5000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-26 07:14:55 SIP 1101 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-26 07:12:39 SIP 123456 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01

18
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 24, 2014, 05:03:18 pm »
Does the log still show similar call activity now?

Actually it does. Any ideas what might cause it?

Code: [Select]
2014-11-24 17:00:42 SIP 1223 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-24 16:54:42 SIP 2001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:46:34 SIP 1223 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-24 16:45:10 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:38:16 SIP 123456 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:34:15 SIP 106 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:32:12 SIP 104 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:28:30 SIP 27 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:26:25 SIP 2001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:19:48 SIP 9000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:19:47 SIP 9000 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:18:42 SIP 27 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-24 16:17:49 SIP 104 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:14:12 SIP 8009 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:14:11 SIP 8009 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:13:06 SIP 2001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:08:48 SIP 27 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:08:27 SIP 8008 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:08:26 SIP 8008 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:04:03 SIP 106 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 16:03:46 SIP 104 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:02:57 SIP 8007 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 16:02:57 SIP 8007 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:59:01 SIP 102 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:57:14 SIP 8006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:57:13 SIP 8006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:56:17 SIP 2001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-24 15:51:42 SIP 8005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:51:41 SIP 8005 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-24 15:49:10 SIP 102 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00

19
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 24, 2014, 11:28:43 am »
I had only one SIP provider and since it did not work I was not using it. Even after disabling that account it was still doing the ringing.
A simple test would be to temporarily disable the external trunk and see if the phantom rings still happen.
doesn't that previous message already answers that option?

20
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 21, 2014, 02:33:26 pm »
whats the correct way to check that? I had only one SIP provider and since it did not work I was not using it. Even after disabling that account it was still doing the ringing.

Fortunately it seems to have stopped ringing after a few reboots.

I still get all these entries in the call detailed records log. Is that normal? I do/use nothing with telecom

Code: [Select]
2014-11-21 14:29:57 SIP 2055 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:25:41 SIP 1181 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 14:22:51 SIP 106 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-21 14:21:25 SIP 1181 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:19:35 SIP 88108 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-21 14:17:12 SIP 1181 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:15:25 SIP 400 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 14:12:58 SIP 1181 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:08:49 SIP 9996 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:06:33 SIP 9999 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 14:04:41 SIP 9996 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:00:24 SIP 9996 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 14:00:19 SIP 400 Wait s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:57:08 SIP 106 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-21 13:56:08 SIP 9996 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:51:55 SIP 8001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:50:42 SIP 209 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:47:43 SIP 8001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:45:24 SIP 400 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:43:32 SIP 8001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:39:22 SIP 8001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:35:13 SIP 9999 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:35:08 SIP 9509 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:31:07 SIP 106 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-21 13:30:57 SIP 9509 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:30:20 SIP 400 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:26:42 SIP 9509 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:22:31 SIP 9509 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-21 13:18:17 SIP 6303 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-21 13:15:01 SIP 1004 Wait s ANSWERED 00:01

21
Users / Re: LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 14, 2014, 08:43:19 am »
it rings every 10 minutes

22
Users / LinuxMCE suddenly rings
« on: November 14, 2014, 07:23:20 am »
LMCE suddenly started ringing. I have tons of unknown entries in the call log but non on the specific ring times. Any ideas what it might be and what might cause it? Also what are all those entries?

Code: [Select]
2014-11-14 07:03:44 SIP 5001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:58:35 SIP 10001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:55:09 SIP 100 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:52:05 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:49:39 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:49:24 SIP 4001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:34:47 SIP 4001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:27:28 SIP 100 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:22:45 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:22:26 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:19:59 SIP 4001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:07:47 SIP 10001 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 06:07:03 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:07:02 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:07:00 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-14 06:06:59 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:06:57 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-14 06:06:56 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:06:54 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-14 06:06:53 SIP 102030 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 06:05:29 SIP 4001 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:59:44 SIP 100 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:53:10 SIP 100 Congestion s ANSWERED 00:13
2014-11-14 05:51:59 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:51:58 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:01
2014-11-14 05:51:57 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:51:56 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:51:55 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:51:54 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00
2014-11-14 05:51:53 SIP 2006 Answer s ANSWERED 00:00

23
Users / way to play/select music. another player?
« on: November 06, 2014, 11:54:14 am »
Anyone has some experience with alternative ways to play music on lmce? I either am missing the flexibility or am using it differently cause I cannot seem to get to easily play audio. My use case is pretty simple: I know where the audio that I want to play is located on the system but cannot easily reach it. when I do a search I can only play one file at a time but I just want to play the folder. I only managed to do that on the public share but the audio I want to play is not. Any ideas?

24
Developers / Re: Market Research
« on: November 06, 2014, 09:06:16 am »
In my mindset, I set the temperature for a room once, I might modify it empirical over time, but never ever do I change the temperature in a room daily or on a time schedule. Way more expensive to reheat a room, than to keep a room at a specific temperature. Maybe other countries/homes are different, but that is the scientific consensus in Germany.

If that is the case we still have along way to go. I never heard about that yet. Here in the Netherlands the temperature is not set to a constant but also not totally to 0 at night. I always thought that it was cheaper to lower the temp a bit but not to much. But as u say the experts know best. Plain logic I think that the bigger the temp difference the bigger the loss and it also depends on the amount of isolation your room has.

25
Users / Re: RF remote, gyration replacement
« on: October 31, 2014, 12:55:24 pm »
I have tried several cheap gyro mini keyboards, and found this one ticks all the boxes for me. 14 quid.

Slightly weird is that the buttons are swapped, but when you are using it it kind of makes sense (closer to your thumb). Battery lasts nearly forever. F keys are all there and don't require shift/function to be pressed. Good range. Also has a card slot in case that's useful for you. My only gripe is that it doesn't have a laser pointer, but to be fair it's only the cats who suffer.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/190897144856


thx a lot mate.

I dont think I get the family used to a keyboard thought. Searching for your item I also found a remote that is more like a standard remote:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/2-4Ghz-Wireless-Air-Fly-Mouse-Keyboard-Remote-Control-For-Android-TV-Box-MX3-/111297791678?pt=PCA_Mice_Trackballs&hash=item19e9dd86be

Maybe that will do a nice job. I also ordered this model.

Keep the suggestions coming.

26
Users / Re: RF remote, gyration replacement
« on: October 28, 2014, 04:12:45 pm »
If its for a RaspberryPi based MD, why don't you try the latest CEC control that phenigma and tschak implemented?

That remark was more to specify the pricepoint. Also then you lack the airmouse. However for that setup with a tv that supports it it is probably the best and easiest solution. I try to find the best remote price quality wise for lmce instead of just fixing my own situation. I noticed that while having a joggler, android tablet and phone at hand the airmouse (gyration remote) is still the device mostly used; its flexible regarding location but always at hand, almost always charged and fast. Best would be if we can find a device that does the job below well or around the $20 mark. I ordered that remote so will try it when it arrives.

more suggestions still welcome....

27
Users / Re: RF remote, gyration replacement
« on: October 28, 2014, 07:51:13 am »
I have used Logitech Mini for years with Linuxmce. Great little device. Looks cool and does the job well.

That seems a bit overpriced and over featured. Especially compared to an md price for a rpi ;-). I ordered the first one which is only $14 and will see if it does a better job then the Mele F10

any more suggestions welcome

28
Users / RF remote, gyration replacement
« on: October 26, 2014, 11:24:02 am »
Anyone already found a proper and affordable replacement for the gyration remotes? My last one is dying and I like to have a comparable replacement. I have a Mele F10 which is not getting close to the gyration in opens and feel.
I also sow the ones below but maybe someone already found a very good solution.....

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Black-EA-01A-RF2-4GHz-Wireless-Air-Mouse-IR-Remote-for-PC-Android-TV-New-in-Box-/231193802972?pt=US_Remote_Controls_Pointers&hash=item35d43978dc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MINIX-NEO-A2-2-4G-Wireless-Voice-Air-Mouse-Keyboard-Remote-Control-PC-Notebook-/390890769802?pt=PCA_Mice_Trackballs&hash=item5b02e7cd8a

29
Developers / Re: squeezelite as an alternative to squeezeslave
« on: October 15, 2014, 07:54:15 pm »
It's not really code just shell script I referred to:
http://forum.linuxmce.org/index.php?topic=13714.msg99923#msg99923

Um?  No.  You can edit the device and describe it any way you would like, just like every other device in the system.
I mean the name squeezelite promotes itself with to the slimserver. That can be the description or whatever. It just a minor change which might help people when debugging.

Heh.  Ok.  I don't see any code or feature patches to support pulseaudio anywhere in the system in trac anywhere.  And since we don't support pulseaudio I will not add specific pulseaudio code until the system supports it.  That being said: Have you even tried it?  Have you put your pulse:sink name in as the output device?  I don't think you've even tried it and from the squeezelite documentation it appears that it should work as is.

I tried that when I created the squeezelite template and launchscript. The only option that is there beside the alsa options is pulse in general:
Code: [Select]
dcerouter_1039929:~# squeezelite -l
Output devices:
  default                        - Playback/recording through the PulseAudio sound server
You can however specify the sink as an environment variable as I did in my launchscript.


Look, I'm getting really frustrated that you that certain people continually complain about things without actually trying to do much of anything about it.  I work *really* hard here *for free* to try and support all kinds of things for people, including things that I don't use like the damn squeezeslave/squeezelite players.   So thanks for testing, I'm glad you're complaining that it doesn't slice and dice and make damn Julien fries at the same freakin' time.  I'm really happy that it's 'working' but not 'properly' becuase it doesn't describe the device to your satisfaction and that it doesn't support an audio subsystem that we don't support at all.

I feel your frustration. I spend just a fraction like you do and all my efforts towards most linuxmce things (like squeezelite) are wasted time since they are not used anyway. Back then I tried to create a separate device for squeezelite but could not get Linuxmce to recognize it as media playable device and stopped trying just because I felt it would end up as not being used anyway.

Since pulseaudio is on the list of wishes of some devs I thought that something small as supporting a pulsesink would not be a problem since it does not influence normal behavior although I understand it has zero priority.

But heeee J.... all your efforts are very much appreciated! We all love ya.  :-*

30
Developers / Re: squeezelite as an alternative to squeezeslave
« on: October 13, 2014, 03:33:08 pm »
Seems to work!

I still think it be nice if you add a proper description to the devices (maybe even the room). And an optional pulsesink selection. I did both in the code I posted previously (not the room though)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 19