Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ardirtbiker

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18
1
Users / Re: To 'bridge' or not to 'bridge'
« on: January 31, 2016, 08:14:24 pm »
Alblasco,

my recent reinstall of 12.04 seems to work fine with the bridge setup.

Just after install, I ran the sql command
Code: [Select]
UPDATE Device_DeviceData SET IK_DeviceData="eth0,dhcp|br0,192.168.80.1,255.255.255.0" WHERE FK_DeviceData=32;
after my bridge was set up, then did an iptables -F followed by '/usr/pluto/bin/Network_Firewall.sh'.

I may not have needed to do all of that, but it works!


Dennis

2
Installation issues / Re: 12.04 update on fresh install
« on: January 29, 2016, 01:40:24 am »
You for sure would know more about that than I.   But i figured it had to be something to do with the version info.

Thanks for your efforts.

Dennis

3
Installation issues / 12.04 update on fresh install
« on: January 28, 2016, 12:53:55 am »
Gentlemen,

I did a fresh 12.04 install on a new SSD drive.  Once installed, I ran Diskless_CreateTBZ.  It failed with the following:
Code: [Select]
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 lmce-md-meta : Depends: pluto-boot-scripts (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-boot-scripts (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-confirm-dependencies (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-confirm-dependencies (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: lmce-install-scripts (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: lmce-install-scripts (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-orbitergen (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-orbitergen (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-avwizard (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-avwizard (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: lmce-launch-manager (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: lmce-launch-manager (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-hald (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-hald (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-orbiter (>= 2.0.0.46) but it is not going to be installed
                Depends: pluto-orbiter (< 2.0.0.47) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
./Diskless_CreateTBZ.sh: line 170: /tmp/TeeMyOutputExitCode_26444: No such file or directory


So, poking around, I did an apt-get update followed by an apt-get upgrade:
Code: [Select]
cerouter_1047429:/usr/pluto/bin# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  lmce-diskless-tools lmce-install-scripts pluto-boot-scripts pluto-hald
  pluto-orbitergen pluto-system-database pluto-website-admin
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 7 not upgraded.
dcerouter_1047429:/usr/pluto/bin#

showing 7 not upgraded.... will not let me upgrade any of them:
Code: [Select]
dcerouter_1047429:/usr/pluto/bin# apt-get install lmce-diskless-tools
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 lmce-diskless-tools : Depends: pluto-boot-scripts (>= 2.0.0.46.201601231149.f3a444c0bc) but 2.0.0.46.16010131783 is to be installed
                       Depends: pluto-plutodhcp (>= 2.0.0.46.201601231149.f3a444c0bc) but 2.0.0.46.16010531792 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
dcerouter_1047429:/usr/pluto/bin#

what I see as the possible problem is the version info not being met.  Im no pro, but it looks like the date/time section is missing the '20' in front of the 16.


anyone got any resolutions?

Thanks,
Dennis


4
Users / Re: To 'bridge' or not to 'bridge'
« on: January 27, 2016, 01:12:44 am »
thank you sir!   

I'll keep a lookout for a resolution to the nfs issue.



Dennis

5
Users / Re: To 'bridge' or not to 'bridge'
« on: January 22, 2016, 01:27:49 am »
Thanks Alblasco,

Here is my /etc/network/interfaces file:
Code: [Select]
# Activating interfaces
auto eth0 br0 lo

#####
# Loopback interface
#####
iface lo inet loopback

#####
# IPv4 network interfaces
#####

# --- External NIC ---
iface eth0 inet dhcp
pre-up sysctl -q -e -w  net.ipv6.conf.eth0.disable_ipv6=1
up /sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
down /sbin/ifconfig eth0 down

# --- Internal NIC ---
iface eth1 inet manual
pre-up sysctl -q -e -w net.ipv6.conf.eth1.disable_ipv6=1
up /sbin/ifconfig eth1 up
down /sbin/ifconfig eth1 down
#####

# --- Wireless NIC ---
iface wlan0 inet manual

# --- Bridge ---
iface br0 inet static
address 192.168.80.1
network 192.168.80.0
netmask 255.255.255.0
broadcast 192.168.80.255
gateway 192.168.1.254
pre-up /usr/sbin/hostapd -B /etc/hostapd/hostapd.conf
bridge_ports eth1 wlan0
dns-nameservers 192.168.1.254 8.8.8.8
dns-search LinuxMCE.local
down /sbin/ifconfig br0 down

Here is /etc/default/isc-dhcp-server:
Code: [Select]
INTERFACES="br0"
and here is the output of iptables -vnL
Code: [Select]
Chain INPUT (policy DROP 3 packets, 116 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination         
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x3F/0x29
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x3F/0x3F
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x3F/0x00
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x06/0x06
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x03/0x03
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x11/0x01
    0     0 DROP       tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            tcp flags:0x3F/0x37
    0     0 ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            mark match 0x1
    2    92 ACCEPT     all  --  lo     *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_Loopback */
  492 57564 ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            state RELATED,ESTABLISHED /* Allow_Established */
    0     0 ACCEPT     udp  --  eth0   *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_DHCP */
    6  1616 ACCEPT     udp  --  br0    *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_DHCP */
    0     0 ACCEPT     udp  --  eth0   *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_DHCP */
    2   120 ACCEPT     tcp  --  br0    *       192.168.80.0/24      0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_Local_Network */

Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination         
    0     0 ACCEPT     all  --  lo     lo      0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_Loopback */
    0     0 ACCEPT     tcp  --  *      *       0.0.0.0/0            0.0.0.0/0            state RELATED,ESTABLISHED /* Allow_Established */
    4  2563 ACCEPT     tcp  --  br0    *       192.168.80.0/24      0.0.0.0/0            /* Allow_Local_Network */

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 317 packets, 45260 bytes)
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               destination         
       



Let me know if you need anything else.

Dennis

6
Users / To 'bridge' or not to 'bridge'
« on: January 21, 2016, 05:28:59 pm »
In lmce 1204 and 1404, bridging appears to have changed within the linux kernel.   In 1004 i had bridged eth1 (internal NIC) with wlan0 (AP) following  the instructions here:http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/Access_Point
After changing 'eth1' in the firewall to 'br0' (the bridge interface), verything worked without a hitch.

In 1204 and 1404, when the bridge is set up the same, the MDs cannot access the nfs storage drives, but my wifi devices work fine. 

Is there a better route to take other than bridging?     Is there something else I need to do to the firewall?   

Some internet sources suggest installing ebtables and set up some rules there and add other rules to iptables.   I dont quite grasp firewalls  and am stuck.

Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Dennis

7
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 05, 2015, 02:52:39 am »
holy cow batman!   It WORKS!

thanks!

Dennis

Im using makemkv-bin so I'll see what in my library it can and cannot play!

Dennis

8
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 05, 2015, 02:37:50 am »
DOHHHH... stupid popup blocker!   lemme try a'gin!   

Dennis

9
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 05, 2015, 02:34:38 am »
I did a sqlcvs diff first.. no differences indicated.   I tried the sqlcvs update but nothing happened other than a reload of the web page.

I verified apt-upgrade is up-to-date.

DVDs launch as normal.

Obviously something is not right... but not sure where to look.

Note:  I am running 12.04

Dennis


10
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 05, 2015, 02:18:40 am »
here is the Xine_Player.log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9674221/

Note that there is information for a bluray file playing in the log (Tron Legacy).   Several attempts with bluray discs placed into the drive were made but Xine_Player log never gets any information about them.

here is the dpkg -l info: http://paste.ubuntu.com/9674235/

Dennis

11
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 05, 2015, 01:49:03 am »
I followed the instructions listed.   Unable to get any further than the disk-detected message... I no longer get the message asking to 'rip' the bluray.

Dennis

12
Users / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 01, 2015, 09:13:48 pm »
Happy New Year to you as well.

Thanks for the info... I'll give it a shot.

Dennis

13
Users / Re: 710,810,1004 or what?
« on: November 01, 2014, 02:58:19 pm »
maverick0815,

I switched to 12.04 a short time ago... its pretty stable and everything that I DO use works.  I am not all that pleased with the newer Mythtv... it seems slower.

Dennis

14
Installation issues / [Resolved] Re: 12.04 - firewall issues?
« on: August 17, 2014, 03:22:50 pm »
An update to this.

I could not get the updated scripts to 'fix' the firewall issues.

I did download the latest 12.04 snapshot and did a fresh install.   This resolved the problem.

Thanks for the hard work guys...

now to see about creating an MD!!!

Dennis

15
Installation issues / Re: 12.04 - firewall issues?
« on: August 06, 2014, 02:17:22 am »
Gentlemen,
I applied the updated files supplied by Alblasco.

Network_Firewall.sh (from reply #9) to /usr/pluto/bin/Network_Firewall.sh (replacing original)
firewall.php (from reply #5) to /var/www/lmce-admin/operations/network/firewall.php (replacing original)

Rebooted core.

still unable to 'ping' an internet web page by name or address from the core OR a workstation getting IP from the core.

can anyone else confirm?

Thanks,
Dennis

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 18