Author Topic: linuxmce.org 2.0  (Read 1848 times)

Ray_N

  • Veteran
  • ***
  • Posts: 57
    • View Profile
    • Your Plan B!
Re: linuxmce.org 2.0
« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2009, 11:06:14 pm »
We should use the main site for updates on features, builds, news on LinuxMCE (from the team), etc... We should leave user generated content to the forum and wiki.

Exactly!  That's what I'm talking about...User-generated content should stay in the wiki.

totallymaxed

  • LinuxMCE God
  • ****
  • Posts: 4660
  • Smart Home Consulting
    • View Profile
    • Dianemo - at home with technology
Re: linuxmce.org 2.0
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2009, 10:04:33 am »
I've spoken to murcel. I agree with wierdbeard65. Having too many places for people to post their experiences with LinuxMCE is spreading it too thin. We already have people posting these type of pages in the wiki. Here is an example:

http://wiki.linuxmce.org/index.php/User:Bdfoster

We should use the main site for updates on features, builds, news on LinuxMCE (from the team), etc... We should leave user generated content to the forum and wiki.

I totally agree too with that.

At a more prosaic level I still cant even figure out how to login at the 'new' site :-(

Andrew
Andy Herron,
CHT Ltd

For Dianemo/LinuxMCE consulting advice;
@herron on Twitter, totallymaxed+inquiries@gmail.com via email or PM me here.

Get Dianemo-Rpi2 ARM Licenses http://forum.linuxmce.org/index.php?topic=14026.0

Get RaspSqueeze-CEC or Raspbmc-CEC for Dianemo/LinuxMCE: http://wp.me/P4KgIc-5P

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Dianemo-Home-Automation/226019387454465

http://www.dianemo.co.uk

dlewis

  • Guru
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: linuxmce.org 2.0
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2009, 03:07:37 pm »
I'd also suggest we have site administrators in all different timezones, so that we can provide coverage 24/7... We'll be discussing all of this.